On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:28 PM, Allan Odgaard mailinglist@textmate.org wrote:
When we review bundles, we ensure that all items are scoped so that they are only active for the bundle’s language
I don't see how you make that out. The Source bundle's double-slashed comment indentedSoftWrap is scoped to comment.line.double-slash; it does not limit itself to source scope. That's the problem.
Similarly, the Text bundle's numbered list indentedSoftWrap is scoped to markup.list.numbered; it does not ask me whether I want _my_ numbered lists to use this setting, it just does it to me.
Thus, for example, if I want to avoid this indented soft wrapping for comments, I can't call my scope comment.line.double-slash.asciidoc. What I'm saying is, okay, then if that is your Final Answer, okay, I won't call my scope that - but asciidoc _does_ have single-line double-slashed comments, so it would be nice if I _could_ use this name but could use my settings to give different instructions for indentedSoftWrap in the comment.line.double-slash.asciidoc scope, namely "none".
Similarly for numbered lists.
That doesn't seem an unreasonable expectation.
m.
-- matt neuburg, phd = http://www.apeth.net/matt/ pantes anthropoi tou eidenai oregontai phusei Programming iOS 7! http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920031017.do iOS 7 Fundamentals! http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920032465.do RubyFrontier! http://www.apeth.com/RubyFrontierDocs/default.html