Hi, I'm newbie with Textmate, but I like it very much :) very nice editor...
but I could not find ine very helpful for me thing..
When I click (or select) some user function name (PHP), I want to see
source it (i.e. defenition) How I could get it ? especially when declaration
of this function in separate file..
Thanks.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Go-to-defenition..-tp25151144p25151144.html
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I install snow leopard (update) but now I can't compile LaTeX document
with textMate
I get :
Could not open to check for packages
This is most likely a problem with TM_LATEX_MASTER
After installing snow, the symbolic link /usr/texbin is destroyed
so
cd /usr
sudo ln -s ../Library/TeX/Distributions/.DefaultTeX/Contents/Programs/
i386 texbin
Upgrading to Snow Leopard also remove /usr/texbin from my default PATH.
I create a text file named TeX with contents
/usr/texbin
and then I move this file to /etc/paths.d. I give this file read-write
permission for everyone
Well now I can compile with TexShop and from the terminal but not
with textmate
I read some tickets on the net and after that, I rename
tm_interactive_input.dylib in textmate.app and in the pristine copy,
now I can compile
but I would like to know if this solution is correct?
Best Regards
Alain Matthes
I am looking for a way to highlight all the occurrences of the text I have
currently selected, or which is in the search buffer (trough command-e). Is
this possible with TextMate, or with a bundle?
(I could do a search and go through the occurrences with command-g, but when
you have a number of occurrences just visible on the screen, it is often
often more convenient to just have all of them highlighted, rather than
having to repeatedly hit command-g.)
Alex
-----
Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise
Orbeon's Blog: http://www.orbeon.com/blog/
Personal Blog: http://avernet.blogspot.com/
Twitter - http://twitter.com/avernet
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Highlight-all-occurrences-of-selection-tp25140566p251…
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I am having the same problem as Hooman...i'm no longer able to fetch posts
with the Blogging Bundle and I get the exact same error as him saying
something about times.
As Allan suggested, I enabled server logging. I did another Fetch Post, got
the same error, and now this is in the log (I **,d out my pswd and modified
my username). This means nothing to me...any help?
2009-08-25 23:50:02 Input: <?xml version="1.0"
?><methodCall><methodName>metaWeblog.getRecentPosts</methodName><params><param><value><string>0</string></value></param><param><value><string>kelle</string></value></param><param><value><string>**pswd**</string></value></param><param><value><i4>20</i4></value></param></params></methodCall>
thanks!
kelle
Hi all,
The latest minor update seems to have introduced a strange behavior.
When moving the cursor pass the end of a line, TextMate now pretends
that the line is full of an infinite number of spaces, instead of
moving to the next line. Same happens when clicking with the mouse.
Let's just say that after spending 20 years editing texts in editors
with the "good old" behavior, I'm quite annoyed that the new behavior
is imposed on me and that there's no option to turn it off.
Could anybody confirm that this is an intended feature of TextMate and
that there's no way to disable it?
Jasmin
Whenever I try to Typesetting the LateX file, which compiled properly
using command line or using TextMate on 10.5, I got the error message
"Could not open to check for packages
This is most likely a problem with
TM_LATEX_MASTER"
I am sure this is not a problem with the TM_LATEX_MASTER". First I am
trying to typeset a single file rather than a project. Second with
nothing changed, this file typeset perfectly on 10.5 with TextMate.
Does anyone have the same problem or can provide some clue for solution?
Hi all-
I'm working on a bundle for the J language, which has some unusual
features.
I wanted to know whether there's a way of altering what
TM_CURRENT_WORD's idea of "current word" is? I didn't have much luck
finding something in the manual or list concerning this. Particularly
if it can be redefined on a per scope basis. (I wouldn't want to make
global changes!)
I certainly can use TM_CURRENT_LINE and TM_LINE_INDEX, and examine
what's around the caret, but if there's a more elegant way, I'd love
to know about it.
Thanks!
Charles Turner
I am using Textmate with some macro functions to create a CSV file. Sadly I
have to do it manually cos the original file had no kind of persistent
pattern to define a structure.
Each like has 2 values separated by commas.
Each record is separated by a series of dots "."
So for example
.......................................................................
This is value 1,"This is value 2
More of value2
More of value2"
........................................................................
I would like to see "This is value 1" in one color and the rest of the
string including the quotes in the following lines in another color.
I am trying to make sense of the rules/language grammar in textmate. What
language is it?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Trying-to-figure-how-to-color-code-a-text-file-tp2508…
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Here's a suggestion I'm sure will never see the light of day, but one
I would love to see -- rendered source code comments.
Basically, I would like to have the option of adding commentary to my
code in whatever text-based format works best for the type of comment
I'm making (latex, markdown, rdoc, dot, etc.), and have those comments
rendered in-line, hiding the original text behind the rendered view.
The editor could have a hotkey to toggle between rendered comments and
regular text comments. Some kind of 'meta'-markup could be used in
the comment to indicate to the editor how a particular block should be
rendered.
This is a lot like Knuth's literate programming concept, only less
invasive to your coding process and without requiring you to compile
your file to see the formatted commentary.
Imagine, you could have beautifully rendered diagrams, equations, and
discourse right in your source file.
Comments?
