[TxMt] svnserve or apache2 on Leopard?
dd at dyce.com
Sat Nov 10 09:51:14 UTC 2007
One thing - daft question probably - but mercurial will tie into
On 10 Nov 2007, at 09:50, Richard Dyce wrote:
> Righto, I'll take a look at Mercurial.
> (I don't think I could face using a piece of software called
> 'Git'.... it's a slang expression in the UK, and the formal
> definition is a 'pregnant camel' IIRC...)
> On 10 Nov 2007, at 03:24, Thomas Aylott - subtleGradient wrote:
>> On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Ramanan Sivaranjan wrote:
>>>> like the 'just' in that sentence... ;-)
>>>> ... I'll see how I get on.
>>> You may want to check out Git or Mercurial. It's a lot easier to
>>> get going I find. Setting up repositories with SVN seems overly
>> Unless you have a specific reason for needing to use a Subversion
>> server, I always recommend Mercurial.
>> It's WAY easier for single-user projects.
>> Git is better suited for seriously massive codebases, but it's a
>> bit more complex in day-to-day life.
>> My reason I've stuck with svn for so long is that I use Dreamhost
>> and they offer one-click HTTP shared subversion repo creation.
>> I'm planning on moving all my projects over to Mercurial
>> eventually, but I've been too busy with the actual projects
>> themselves ;)
More information about the textmate