[TxMt] svnserve or apache2 on Leopard?
dd at dyce.com
Sat Nov 10 09:50:17 UTC 2007
Righto, I'll take a look at Mercurial.
(I don't think I could face using a piece of software called 'Git'....
it's a slang expression in the UK, and the formal definition is a
'pregnant camel' IIRC...)
On 10 Nov 2007, at 03:24, Thomas Aylott - subtleGradient wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Ramanan Sivaranjan wrote:
>>> like the 'just' in that sentence... ;-)
>>> ... I'll see how I get on.
>> You may want to check out Git or Mercurial. It's a lot easier to
>> get going I find. Setting up repositories with SVN seems overly
> Unless you have a specific reason for needing to use a Subversion
> server, I always recommend Mercurial.
> It's WAY easier for single-user projects.
> Git is better suited for seriously massive codebases, but it's a bit
> more complex in day-to-day life.
> My reason I've stuck with svn for so long is that I use Dreamhost
> and they offer one-click HTTP shared subversion repo creation.
> I'm planning on moving all my projects over to Mercurial eventually,
> but I've been too busy with the actual projects themselves ;)
More information about the textmate