[TxMt] svnserve or apache2 on Leopard?

[Richard Dyce]

Righto, I'll take a look at Mercurial.

(I don't think I could face using a piece of software called 'Git'....  
it's a slang expression in the UK, and the formal definition is a  
'pregnant camel' IIRC...)

Thanks,

R

On 10 Nov 2007, at 03:24, Thomas Aylott - subtleGradient wrote:

> On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Ramanan Sivaranjan wrote:
>
>>> like the 'just' in that sentence... ;-)
>>> ... I'll see how I get on.
>>
>> You may want to check out Git or Mercurial.  It's a lot easier to  
>> get going I find.  Setting up repositories with SVN seems overly  
>> tedious.
>>
>> Ramanan.
>
>
> Unless you have a specific reason for needing to use a Subversion  
> server, I always recommend Mercurial.
> It's WAY easier for single-user projects.
> Git is better suited for seriously massive codebases, but it's a bit  
> more complex in day-to-day life.
>
> My reason I've stuck with svn for so long is that I use Dreamhost  
> and they offer one-click HTTP shared subversion repo creation.
>
> I'm planning on moving all my projects over to Mercurial eventually,  
> but I've been too busy with the actual projects themselves ;)