[TxMt] Re: TextMate 1 vs 2

[Travis Dunn]

You can make an argument that the point of the filesystem is to organize files/projects and that's how most editors work.

I've been a textmate user for a long time and I've never used "projects", that's not to say that I think it is an unused feature at all, or that some support for those features shouldn't be brought back, but I don't see it as a major feature, and i certainly don't see it as a huge disappointment.

Why not suggest a few ideas for how to bring the feature back, or make it better instead of threatening to switch to another editor.

An ongoing post is already up here: http://wiki.macromates.com/Suggestions/ProjectManagementInTextMate2

I don't think TM2 is a disappointment at all, and everyone has busted ass working on it (at least since it went open source), so maybe keep the negative to a minimal and try to be helpful rather than hurtful

- Mom

On Sep 20, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Walter Lee Davis <waltd at wdstudio.com> wrote:

> If Chocolat ever gets the "magic clean up indenting" command, it's going to be very hard to stick with TextMate.
> 
> Walter
> 
> On Sep 20, 2012, at 2:25 PM, dvlogic wrote:
> 
>> Agreed 100% - I keep going back to TM1 because it just works for my workflow
>> - TM2 has been a huge disappointment.  I've also been playing with Sublime 2
>> and feel it might have potential.
>> 
>> -- dv
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://textmate.1073791.n5.nabble.com/TextMate-1-vs-2-tp25768p25771.html
>> Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> textmate mailing list
>> textmate at lists.macromates.com
>> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate