[TxMt] Re: Any news on textmate 2?

[Thor Erik Lie]

I find Textmate to fit my use perfectly as it is.
I can't actually see a point other than perhaps underlying code that could
be improved.


2011/6/30 Sven Axelsson <sven.axelsson at gmail.com>

> On 30 June 2011 14:32, Justin Catterall <100621.1 at masonsmusic.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 30 Jun 2011, at 13:06, Sven Axelsson wrote:
> >
> >> Is Textmate the current record holder now when Duke Nuk'em Forever
> >> finally have been released?
> >
> > I just Googled for vaporware to find the (probably) huge number of
> programs
> > that have been promised *way* before TM2 (which AIUI hasn't even been
> > promised) and which still haven't arrived, and I notice that TM2 has been
> > added to the Wikipedia page. Was that you?
>
> No, it wasn't me. The Wikipedia text was added in October 2010 by
> anonymous. Of course I wasn't really serious when I wrote the above.
> But as you may know, Textmate has already been mentioned along with
> other famous vaporware in this Wired article:
> http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/vaporware-2009-inhale-the-fail/
>
> I can appreciate that people find Textmate 1 "good enough", and I did
> so myself for a long time. I have however switched to Vim now. I will
> no doubt have another look at Textmate when version 2 eventually
> releases, but for now I am happy with Vim.
>
> --
> Sven Axelsson
> ++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++
> >++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<.
> +++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20110630/30c7f47c/attachment-0001.html>