[TxMt] Writing a Book with TextMate
Christopher Brewster
C.Brewster at dcs.shef.ac.uk
Fri Jun 6 16:30:17 UTC 2008
>
> 1) Option Latex ( Christopher and Thomas)
>
> Advantages:
>
> * Can successfully handle footnoes, references and Indexes
> * Provides pre-publishing Layout options
>
> Disadvantages:
>
> * Learning Curve
I really think people make too much of this. If you use the basic
templates in TextMate you off to a flying start.
You only learn something when you need it and if a project is taking
time as a proportion of your effort it is not very great.
>
> * Markup can become complex and bulk up
I do not see this as an issue.
>
> * How about cross platform compatability ? ( Is it possible to get
> stripped down textversions and such ?)
It is easy to export Latex to text. There are excellent converters to
HTML but is not an ideal route - I would always prefer PDF.
Cross platform no problem as latex works on Windows/Mac/Linux - hard
to see a problem here.
>
>
> Further Questions:
>
> * How about Project handling ? ( My reference stuff is about 700 Mib.
> Keep in seperate Project ?)
Latex is perfect for very large projects, books, even multivolume works.
>
>
> * How about Images and Charts ( I also have some charts that are done
> with Omnigraffle Pro that I wanna update occasionally without loosing
> reference track to the original Omnigraffle files)
There is no better environment to handle images (Apple's Pages does
pretty well I have to say).
I did all my graphics for my PhD in Omnigraffle, export to jpg or png
and I could revise them whenever.
Finally if you ever need maths formulas, again latex cannot be beaten.
Finaly, finally latex is very beautiful. If you care for the
aesthetics of a book or document, nothing can compare with using a
well designed style.
This is something you would leave to an expert and there are dozens if
not hundreds of designs out there for books, PhDs, articles,
newsletters, etc.
I chose for my PhD a design by Andre Mede (www.mede.de) which was
beautiful and much complemented in the end.
What markdown is better at is keeping text/html/pdf in sync if that is
important. But you will not get the same aesthetics (as far as I can
make out).
Christopher
>
>
>
> 2) Option Markdown ( Kevin)
>
> Advantages:
>
> * For Simplicity
> * Easy conversion to HTML TXT and PDF
> * For Layout PDF Versions Prince can be used
>
> Disadvantages:
>
> * Indexes , Footnotes and References can be used, however:
> * Brett Terpstra's HTML Index Bundle can be used.
> * If chapters are kept in single files, then this obviously makes a
> conversion into other formats more complicated, need of Shell script
> commands, etc.
>
>
> Questions:
>
>
> 3) Option Scrivener in combination with Multimarkdown (Fletcher)
>
> Advantages:
>
>
> * Allows nonlinear organization and writing
> * Supports multimarkdown LATEX txt and PDF Export
> * Both Import and Export with footnotes and Anotations are supported,
> provided, certain requirements in Document structure are met
>
> quote:
>
> You want flexibility in your document - you don’t want to be tied
> into
> a single document type. With MultiMarkdown you can convert your
> document
> to XHTML, RTF, LaTeX, or Word .doc, to name a few. With the proper
> knowledge, many other formats are possible.
>
> end quote
>
> * A Implementation Guide is available at the Scrivener formums here:
> http://www.literatureandlatte.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=497
> * Template Support and multiple Layout options
> * Footnotes , Labels and refs conversion into markdown supported
>
> further Info:
> http://fletcherpenney.net/Using_MultiMarkdown_with_Scrivener
>
> Disadvantages:
>
> * Project maintenance might get a little out of scope
>
>
> NOTE: So this basically makes it possible to maintain your Book
> Project
> Folder under one Roof as project siblings
>
> Also: Multimarkdown export option provides XHTML which makes parallel
> Web publishing procedures and maintenance of certain Book-chapters
> for
> promotion easier
>
>
> 4) Further Markdown option (Markdown2Book Bundle by John Gruber
> based on
> initial Scripts by Allan)
>
> http://lists.macromates.com/pipermail/textmate/2006-February/008160.html
>
> * Designed basically for documentations:
>
> quote:
>
> This bundle is for compiling a Documentation project made of several
> Markdown files to HTML. It generates a TOC, a print version with all
> chapters on one page and HTML files for each chapter. You can use
> references to easily link between your pages.
>
> end quote
>
> ( Haven't checked this out yet in detail)
>
>
>
> If you have any additional suggestions, Ideas and also recommendations
> how a Project should be structured in each of those cases, then please
> let me know. I will then update my list and publish that in short on
> my
> Blog.
>
>
> regards, marios
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
>
More information about the textmate
mailing list