Cutting Edge (was: [TxMt] TextMate with TeXniscope - PDF file not written to disk)

[Dave Grijalva]

since 2.0 will be leopard only, will the updater be smart enough to not
upgrade me if I'm on a tiger machine?

-dave

On 2/19/07, Allan Odgaard <throw-away-1 at macromates.com> wrote:
>
> On 19. Feb 2007, at 00:00, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
>
> > PS: I am starting to wonder, should this "cutting edge" really be
> > called cutting edge? I think it may be putting some people off the
> > idea. Cutting edge is following the subversion repository, the
> > "cutting edge" versions I think are very stable. Am I wrong?
>
> Well, currently 1.5 mostly sees maintenance work, i.e. various fixes,
> so in practice "cutting edge" is where the fixes appear first.
>
> But when it's time to put out 2.0 builds, cutting edge will regain
> its meaning.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20070219/c1652a37/attachment.html>