since 2.0 will be leopard only, will the updater be smart enough to not upgrade me if I'm on a tiger machine? -dave <div>On 2/19/07, Allan Odgaard <<a href="mailto:throw-away-1@macromates.com">throw-away-1@macromates.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On 19. Feb 2007, at 00:00, Charilaos Skiadas wrote: > PS: I am starting to wonder, should this "cutting edge" really be > called cutting edge? I think it may be putting some people off the > idea. Cutting edge is following the subversion repository, the > "cutting edge" versions I think are very stable. Am I wrong? Well, currently 1.5 mostly sees maintenance work, i.e. various fixes, so in practice "cutting edge" is where the fixes appear first. But when it's time to put out 2.0 builds, cutting edge will regain its meaning. ______________________________________________________________________ For new threads USE THIS: <a href="mailto:textmate@lists.macromates.com"> textmate@lists.macromates.com</a> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't) <a href="http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate">http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate </a> </blockquote></div>