Distributed model for bundles (was: [TxMt] Bundle and language help)

Ivan Pan ipan at freeshell.org
Sat Aug 4 05:12:59 UTC 2007


On Aug 3, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:

> The solution I am pondering is switching to a distributed version  
> control system (like git or mercurial). This has a few advantages  
> such as allowing people w/o commit access to still do regular  
> commits to the bundle they work on (applied to their local clone of  
> the bundle).

More information on distributed version control system -- git. Linus  
Torvalds' Google Tech Talk: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8>

I don't think there will be any conflict of having a svn and a git at  
the same time. We have a subversion server for the default bundles  
that comes with TM, and various git servers for the bundles that are  
not included in the default distribution.

I have not tried git or mercurial, so I can not really comment if  
this would help with the process of the development. Linux Torvalds,  
who I imagine to be smart guy, seems to be pretty confident about the  
distributed model.

ip




More information about the textmate mailing list