Distributed model for bundles (was: [TxMt] Bundle and language help)
Ivan Pan
ipan at freeshell.org
Sat Aug 4 05:12:59 UTC 2007
On Aug 3, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
> The solution I am pondering is switching to a distributed version
> control system (like git or mercurial). This has a few advantages
> such as allowing people w/o commit access to still do regular
> commits to the bundle they work on (applied to their local clone of
> the bundle).
More information on distributed version control system -- git. Linus
Torvalds' Google Tech Talk: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8>
I don't think there will be any conflict of having a svn and a git at
the same time. We have a subversion server for the default bundles
that comes with TM, and various git servers for the bundles that are
not included in the default distribution.
I have not tried git or mercurial, so I can not really comment if
this would help with the process of the development. Linux Torvalds,
who I imagine to be smart guy, seems to be pretty confident about the
distributed model.
ip
More information about the textmate
mailing list