[TxMt] adding to or modifying the symbol list for LaTeX?

[Allan Odgaard]

On 26/1/2006, at 1:35, Matthias Damm wrote:

>> [...]
> I am not sure if you can really compare beamer and koma here.  
> Beamer has some syntax which is quite different from standard  
> LaTeX. But koma is just a variant of LaTeX, it replaces the  
> standard article, book etc. classes by scrartcl, scrbook etc. and  
> gives you some more options. I don't think that koma support will  
> hurt any standard LaTeX user.

Then we can probably add support for that in the standard LaTeX  
grammar, similar to how the C grammar markup miscellaneous Mac  
specific types (which are not in the C language/library per se).

Curious, what are the advantages of using koma? And do you have a  
link with more info?