[TxMt] TM & UBB code some questions

[Andre]

On 25 Jan 2005, at 16:44, Sune Foldager wrote:

> On 25. jan 2005, at 16:57, David Casal wrote:
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2005, at 15:47, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2005, at 16:43, Sune Foldager wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes... of course, since emacs has a complete language built in. In 
>>>> the future I would like to see a built-in language in TM also 
>>>> (although, please not Lisp.. and NOT AppleScript) :-).
>>>
>>> Then we're left with Brainfuck! [1]
>>
>> Ruby! Ruby!
>
> Yes Ruby... except Ruby's current interpretor is not very well-suited 
> for imbedding. All the problems mod_ruby has and had is a good 
> showcase for this. For one, there is no way to reset the intepretor. 
> It's just not designed for embedding, but maybe Matz will get around 
> to rewrite the interpretor (which is also written in a kinda 
> old-fashioned C-style currently).
>

Python + PyObjC ?

-- Andre