[TxMt] TM & UBB code some questions

[Sune Foldager]

On 25. jan 2005, at 16:57, David Casal wrote:
>
> On 25 Jan 2005, at 15:47, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>
>> On Jan 25, 2005, at 16:43, Sune Foldager wrote:
>>
>>> Yes... of course, since emacs has a complete language built in. In 
>>> the future I would like to see a built-in language in TM also 
>>> (although, please not Lisp.. and NOT AppleScript) :-).
>>
>> Then we're left with Brainfuck! [1]
>
> Ruby! Ruby!

Yes Ruby... except Ruby's current interpretor is not very well-suited 
for imbedding. All the problems mod_ruby has and had is a good showcase 
for this. For one, there is no way to reset the intepretor. It's just 
not designed for embedding, but maybe Matz will get around to rewrite 
the interpretor (which is also written in a kinda old-fashioned C-style 
currently).

-- 
Sune.
:: the Cottage of Lost Play.
:: http://cyanite.org