[txmt-dev] Re: Is boost still necessary when using C++11 with libc++?

Allan Odgaard mailinglist at textmate.org
Thu Aug 30 21:16:13 UTC 2012


On Aug 30, 2012, at 10:16 PM, Adam Strzelecki <ono at java.pl> wrote:

> Not that there is anything wrong Boost, but IMHO less dependencies is better. So are there any Boost features used in TM2 that are not available in C++11?

We use boost::variant — that’s the only thing though (as I just updated to std::tuple).



More information about the textmate-dev mailing list