[SVN] r8757 (JavaScript JSDoc)
Thomas Aylott - subtleGradient
textmate at subtleGradient.com
Mon Dec 31 21:12:40 UTC 2007
I'll have to think about my comments some more once i'm back at my
computer.
Thomas Aylott [SubtleGradient] from iPhone
On Dec 31, 2007, at 5:42 AM, Michael Sheets <mummer at whitefalls.org>
wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2007, at 4:41 AM, Michael Sheets wrote:
>
>> Adding review comments.
>
> # JavaScript JSDoc Bundle Comments
>
> Can we get a general show of hands on how widely used JSDoc is, and
> if it's the only doc system for JavaScript? If it is we might want
> to consider just moving this into the main JavaScript bundle?
I think there's another one. Someone will have to get a real answer
though. Maybe ask around in all the js library IRC channels.
I would rather have the most widely used doc syntax included than make
it very complex.
The trouble with not including the syntax is that nobody would use it
except the 5 people that know about it and how to do it.
If each js library uses a different syntax then we can just override
the doc syntax in the library grammar.
> * Unsure of tab trigger of /* might it be trigger by accident as
> people align comments? Would /** change that, or is it not an issue?
Yeah good thinking. /** might be fine.
> * The "Comment" snippet seems misnamed, it should be Doc Comment or
> similar. Or seeing as we have a block comment shortcut (⌘⌥/) we
> could either make it that a second press of the shortcut would conve
> rt the current comment block into a doc comment block, or make a sec
> ond shortcut.
I'd like to keep the comment toggle on and off only. A 3 state toggle
doesn't sound fun. But that might actually be the best option since
it's a known shortcut.
> * Could move away from using CocoaDialog in favor of tm_dialog.
> * Could add a new rule to the JavaScript grammar to give doc blocks
> their own scope to make the snippets more narrowly focused.
Agreed.
More information about the textmate-dev
mailing list