[SVN] Punctuation Scope

David Powers david at grayskies.net
Wed Aug 23 12:19:14 UTC 2006


the only problem with structure is that part of the meaning of
punctuation is "something that provides structure", so it could be
initially confusing.  Still, possibly better than definition.

How about, maybe, puntuation.inline?  For inline definitions/demarcations.

On 8/23/06, Chris Thomas <chris at cjack.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Michael Sheets wrote:
>
> >> Glad you like it - now that you (and allan, etc) have explained it to
> >> me, I see a lot of use in the scope.  Let's see what the rest of the
> >> nitpickers have to say about the revision.  :)
> >>
> >> (This is why I wander into the room to be such a pain in the a**
> >> about
> >> things I don't understand right away... :D)
> >
> > Jacobolus is too lame to post here even after I got the list on
> > Gmane, anyhow his thoughts are that he likes the general layout and
> > such. His only dislike was the word definition, he thinks it
> > doesn't really convey the concept as well as he'd like. Best we
> > could come up with as a substitute was element though, and allan
> > didn't really like it. Anyone know of any better word?
>
> If I understand everything correctly, the declarations that you're
> proposing to delimit with 'punctuation.definition' are the very same
> inline data of the type in the Javascript subthread. Maybe use the
> outcome of that discussion for consistency?
>
> Using the 'structure' proposal, you'd have categories like:
>
>         punctuation.structure.table
>         punctuation.structure.string
>
> ...which makes sense to me.
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate-dev mailing list
> textmate-dev at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
>



More information about the textmate-dev mailing list