[SVN] Punctuation Scope

Chris Thomas chris at cjack.com
Wed Aug 23 05:02:33 UTC 2006


On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Michael Sheets wrote:

>> Glad you like it - now that you (and allan, etc) have explained it to
>> me, I see a lot of use in the scope.  Let's see what the rest of the
>> nitpickers have to say about the revision.  :)
>>
>> (This is why I wander into the room to be such a pain in the a**  
>> about
>> things I don't understand right away... :D)
>
> Jacobolus is too lame to post here even after I got the list on  
> Gmane, anyhow his thoughts are that he likes the general layout and  
> such. His only dislike was the word definition, he thinks it  
> doesn't really convey the concept as well as he'd like. Best we  
> could come up with as a substitute was element though, and allan  
> didn't really like it. Anyone know of any better word?

If I understand everything correctly, the declarations that you're  
proposing to delimit with 'punctuation.definition' are the very same  
inline data of the type in the Javascript subthread. Maybe use the  
outcome of that discussion for consistency?

Using the 'structure' proposal, you'd have categories like:

	punctuation.structure.table
	punctuation.structure.string

...which makes sense to me.

Chris



More information about the textmate-dev mailing list