[SVN] Revision 882 (Latex)

[Brad Miller]

OK,

So for example the Latex Theme currently has defined some styling for
\textbf{foo bar}  to make foo and bar bold
\textit{foo bar} to make foo and bar italic

\ref{} \cite{} currently get colored differently from any old  
\command to help set them apart.

Maybe I don't yet grok the generic themes well enough but these all  
seem like they would fall under option 3 below?

On May 9, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:

> On May 9, 2005, at 19:18, Brad Miller wrote:
>
>
>> If there is a different long term plan for handling the additional  
>> syntax highlighting etc for a language than what we are currently  
>> doing with the themes then maybe we should just delete the Latex  
>> theme and wait for that to happen?
>>
>
> The idea is that the White/black/grey/simple theme should really  
> style ALL languages.
>
> So I'd say yes, delete the LaTeX theme. In a few betas there will  
> be a per language possibility to have a settings file, but that  
> should be for non-visual settings (like these inc/dec patterns and  
> related, i.e. what's currently placed in the Basic settings).
>
> If something looks wrong in a LaTeX file using one of the generic  
> themes, either (prioritized) 1) the names used in the language  
> definition should be changed, 2) the naming scheme should be  
> revised to allow for generic themes, or (last option) 3) an add-on  
> should be created for that language (like e.g. the Diff colors,  
> which do not set foreground/background etc., but only the new  
> elements defined in the Diff language file).
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate-dev mailing list
> textmate-dev at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
>