[TxMt] start/endtag from previous word macro

[Allan Odgaard]

On 09/10/2005, at 0.59, Andreas Wahlin wrote:

>> The beauty of XHTML is you can then parse it with XML parsers and  
>> do tricks with that, etc etc.
>> [...]
> ah, didn't really think of it that way ... well, persuasive  
> arguments indeed. I'll probably have to stick with xhtml then :)
> On the other hand, there are issues with MIME types, that no one  
> will probably notice anyways ...
> http://www.webstandards.org/learn/askw3c/sep2003.html

The link is currently down (it seems), but there's also this:

    http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml

Which basically says: stick with HTML 4, because what's currently  
happening is, that a lot of people deliver broken HTML (as text/ 
html), and it probably wouldn't validate as strict XHTML (if  
delivered as application/xml+xhtml, which one can't really use  
because of lacking browser support, but which changes how the  
document should validate).