[TxMt] Re: File open regression in 2.0-beta.11.5?
carpii.uk at gmail.com
Wed Aug 24 21:13:43 UTC 2016
> So even after you disabled the support for mangled Windows 95 names, you
> are still seeing failure from atomic saving?
I was sure my Samba config changes had fixed the problem, but it was just a
My changes don't seem to have fixed much at all, although when it does
fail, acts a little differently to what it did before
> I plan to try and branch TM to disable Atomic Saves for certain paths
> I've dug through the source a little, but this change doesn't seem
> so any gotcha's or pointers would be appreciated
> TextMate reporting “Atomic Saving Failed” is a bit of a misnomer.
> I think I described it earlier, that on a network file system it would
> create a new /path/to/file~ and then run mv /path/to/file~ /path/to/file.
> So what you probably want is to instead open the original file directly
> and just overwrite it, so you are not disabling a feature, your changing
> the code (to be less safe).
Thanks, I'm right in thinking ./Frameworks/file/src/save.cc is the place I
should be looking to make this change?
I mentioned some tests in the thread about atomic saving, if it still fails
> for you, evne with the name mangling support disabled in SMB, it would be
> good to get the results from these tests, as then TextMate could maybe
> handle the issue better
Good point. I will re-run these tests
I think I provided the results from this before I made any smb changes, but
I will try again now my SMB config is different
Thanks Allan, As I say, I'm sure it's not a TM problem so much as the
environment Im using it in, So I do appreciate your continued advice :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the textmate