[TxMt] Re: Interested in helping out with TextMate development
Stefan Daschek
stefan at daschek.net
Sun Apr 10 16:57:38 UTC 2016
Am 10.04.16 um 18:51 schrieb Curt Sellmer:
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Josh Bernitt <jjbernitt at gmail.com
> <mailto:jjbernitt at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Is that in addition to hitting ⌘F? I can do ⌘E ⌘F and that uses my
> selection for Find. I was thinking of bypassing the manual choice
> entirely and always using the highlighted portion of text as the
> Find value. It’s how Sublime Text, Atom, and IntelliJ all work, but
> perhaps that’s not the best then? All those other editors are not
> native Mac apps, so maybe if I try to bypass the ⌘E, that will
> detract from the native experience and choice. I had not considered
> that at all. Thoughts?
>
>
>
> I would prefer to keep it as is. This change would also be awkward
> with the "Find in Selection" feature which I find is quite useful.
+1 to keep the current behaviour (at least as an option).
One of things I do really often:
1) Select a string I want to replace and press ⌘E to make it the
current search string.
2) Select a part of my document.
3) Press ⌘⌥F to do a “Find All” restricted to the current selection.
4) Start typing to replace each occurance at once (multiple carets are
such a great feature, btw!)
(I omit step 1 if the thing I want to replace is already the current
search string.)
Stefan
More information about the textmate
mailing list