[TxMt] Re: a small delightful feature has gone missing, I think
Allan Odgaard
mailinglist at textmate.org
Thu Nov 20 08:23:17 UTC 2014
On 20 Nov 2014, at 2:44, Matt Neuburg wrote:
> But I don't understand how you make the leap from "this is the type of
> the file" (using some sort of scope) to "this is the extension that
> new file names should have". I don't see anything there about a file
> extension, which is what I'm after. m.
When you set the file type to `text.asciidoc` then TextMate will use the
first extension listed in the grammar for that scope (which should be
`asciidoc`) when saving (and there isn’t already a name asssociated
with the document).
More information about the textmate
mailing list