[TxMt] Re: rmate is a life saver

[Eduardo Francos]

I totally agree. Emacs has its own strong points, but doesn't beat TM :-)
I have a problem though with the connection type rmate uses. Some of my clients' web sites are hosted in mutualized servers who don't allow hosted user scripts to open sockets, and can only be accessed through the standard HTTP/HTTPS means. In this configuration the rmate fails with an authorization error.
I started looking at implementing a kind of rmate HTTP tunnel to ensure the transfer of commands and contents.
The idea is to have a local "httpmate" program that communicates with a web service on the remote site to do the job, while communicating with the locally running TM through the rmate normal channel.


On 26 juin 2014, at 06:39, Sergei G <sergeig.public at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> I've been using TextMate for a couple years now and I just learned about rmate. It is a true lifesaver, because now I can stop using Emacs in ssh terminal and start using a normal editor.
> 
> This feature is worth bragging about.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20140626/05ad5ee7/attachment.asc>