[TxMt] Re: Do I have to pay for the final TM 2 license key?

[kafi]

Jason McC. Smith wrote
> Actually, I said that *if* you had not contributed, *then* you, (or anyone
> else IMO) would be a parasite.
>  ...  (Don't get me started on the mess that is Eclipse...)
> ... There is a clear-cut method for contributing to TM2: a license fee.  


Open source software should be free for non-commercial personal use. As I do
not see any other open source software (except TM 2) that demands license. 

Its quite apparent from your writing that you ve no manners. Your apology
stinks. 

In your (SNOBBY) opinion, except TM 2 every other open source efforts are
bad examples of coding, design etc! This is outrageous and voids any other
reasoning in your post. 

Since 'ONLY' TM 2 is a QUALITY 'open-source' product (its still in alpha
BTW), you are persuading me to pay for it (like many other members here) by
calling me names. 

According to your understanding, the users should be forced to contribute in
the 'Open Source' TM 2 by paying for it!! Really???? What about the free
option that an Open source project warrants?



--
View this message in context: http://textmate.1073791.n5.nabble.com/Do-I-have-to-pay-for-the-final-TM-2-license-key-tp26689p26719.html
Sent from the textmate users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.