[TxMt] Re: TextMate 1 vs 2

[Randall Hand]

Ok. Tomorrow morning ill see how close I can get to rebuilding my tm1
project this way. I this is the future, I wanna prepare for it early.
Who knows, maybe ill save myself $50 :)

Is there anything akin to tm1's Templates?

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:51 PM, "Jason McC. Smith" <jason at ncpod.org> wrote:

> The link Travis posted above is perhaps the best listing I've seen yet.
>
> What I'm more curious about, however, is a comprehensive listing of
> available scopes, action triggers, etc.  I realize it's a dynamically
> built environment based on the current bundles, but is there some way
> to get a report from within TM2?
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Randall Hand <randall.hand at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is there any comprehensive documentation on what goes in this
>> tm_properties file?  I see lots of random snippets scattered around
>> the mailing list, but I haven't come across a full list.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Allan Odgaard <mailinglist at textmate.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 20, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Randall Hand <randall.hand at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> […] Is TM1 still "alive"? Or are users urged to start using TM2?  Am I just really missing
>>>> something in TextMate2?
>>>
>>> TM 1.x is not being actively maintained, but it still works great for a lot of people.
>>>
>>> TM 2.0 is alpha, and I don’t yet link directly to it from macromates.com because I am aware that there are still some things to iron out before I want to actively steer people toward it — particularly the issue of projects and creating new files is something new users often struggle with.
>>>
>>> That said, despite the rather negative outbursts in this thread, a lot of people find most aspects of 2.0 vastly superior to 1.x, but the “learning curve” is a little steep, as the UX hasn’t seen any polish and GUI is still lacking for some aspects.
>>>
>>>> […] project-specific environment variables, and true "Projects" are important to me.
>>>
>>> The first part has IMO been much improved in 2.0 because they are now just text files which can be version controlled, see e.g. http://blog.macromates.com/2011/git-style-configuration/ (although several of the settings mentioned has since received UI).
>>>
>>> For the second one, I assume you mean grouping files which are spread out over your disk (and not via symbolic links); this is probably not something I am going to add, but part of the decision for making 2.0 open source was to allow users to add the things I don’t care for.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> textmate mailing list
>>> textmate at lists.macromates.com
>>> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> textmate mailing list
>> textmate at lists.macromates.com
>> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate