[TxMt] Re: symlinking vs copying "mate" into the path

[Neil]

Alright, I'm going to do that. Seems saner. >.>


On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Adam Strzelecki <ono at java.pl> wrote:

> > Is there a reason TextMate copies mate into the user's $PATH instead of
> just making a symlink to the command inside the Application's resources?
>
> Yeah, I was about to ask the same :)
>
> > What dangers do I run if I do decide to symlink it? (As part of a system
> configuration bootstrap script. I could copy it, but it would be a little
> more work.)
>
> Well I have it symlinked anyway (rather than copied using Preferences) and
> it works like a charm for long time already.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Adam Strzelecki | nanoant.com | twitter.com/nanoant
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20121031/66802b56/attachment.html>