[TxMt] Re: sublime text 2 (slightly OT)

[Phil]

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Guido Governatori <gvdgdo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just looked quickly at it, and as it only had text/command
>> completion based on the contents of the current buffer, I didn't
>> consider it more. (I was looking for an editor for Python coding.)
>> But I'm open for second looks, if I missed some vital pieces ... :)
>>
> In Sublime Text 2 the completion is customizable per syntax language (actually I think per scope), you can create a completion file for a language, in addition to the words in the (current) document.

In TextMate RopeMate works well, and in Emacs Ropemacs works well.
They both offer intelligent completion (showing if it's a function,
method etc.). But I haven't gotten method definition/description
popups to work in RopeMate/TextMate. (Only tested with Python.)

-- 
Phil :)