[TxMt] Re: Honest assessment of TM2's state please!

Kyle. ambertk at gmail.com
Mon Apr 25 20:15:00 UTC 2011


I tend to agree with David. TM1 is the single-most useful bit of proprietary
software in my research workflow, but that's beside the point. Did we
purchase an application or a contract? I tend to believe the former.

Kyle H. Ambert
Fellow, National Library of Medicine
Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology
Oregon Health & Science University
On Apr 25, 2011 12:00 PM, "David Clark" <david at davidsaccess.com> wrote:
> Alan does not owe anybody anything.
>
> If you are unhappy with TM1 use another application - end of story.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Jenny Harrison <profharrison at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> You are so right, Gerd.  The time has come for Allan to be open and frank
with us.
>>
>> Jenny
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> textmate mailing list
>> textmate at lists.macromates.com
>> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
>>
>
>
>
> --
> dc
>
> David Clark
> dmclark ·(skype / twitter)
>
>
>
> --
> dc
>
> David Clark
> 16 Harcourt St #2I
> Boston, MA 02116
> 617/859-3069 (h)
> 617/697-2690 (c)
> dmclark ·(skype / twitter)
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20110425/749bf089/attachment.html>


More information about the textmate mailing list