[TxMt] Re: LaTeX completion
Édouard Gilbert
edouard.gilbert at gmail.com
Sun Oct 11 14:14:50 UTC 2009
Le 10 oct. 09 à 07:23, Alex Ross a écrit :
> The work flow that I can support is typing:
>
> \b⇥e⇥ for enumerate
> \b⇥i⇥ for itemize
>
> On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:16 PM, David Whetstone wrote:
>
>> Completion is nice, as long as it works like ⌘T, i.e. type any
>> sequence of characters and not just the starting sequence. That
>> way I
>> could still type 'enum' to expand an enumerate block, for example.
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Alex Ross wrote:
>>
>>> LaTeX users:
>>>
>>> My plan is to remove most of the completion commands and latex
>>> snippets from the LaTeX bundle. They will be replaced by a single
>>> command. I have a prototype under construction, you can see how it
>>> works here:
>>>
>>> http://lasersox.net/LaTeXCompletion.m4v
>>>
>>> Basically there is a tree of completions, and you can navigate them
>>> just by typing. We can work citation completion, and all existing
>>> snippets into this system.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
Yes. First of all, I hope the snippets content won’t actually change.
I’m quite used to the current ones and find most of them pleasing.
I’d have no use for
\begin{figure}
\end{figure}
And I actually love the
\section{Title} % (fold)
\label{title}
% title (end)
And, perhaps more importantly, I’m worried of the systematic use of
backslash. It’s a three-key on my french keyboard. Moreover, not
three key I acces the most easily. So overuse of it, while logical
when using LaTeX, would actually be quite a pain to use for me.
Édouard GILBERT
edouard.gilbert at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ?douard Gilbert.vcf
Type: text/directory
Size: 510 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20091011/2c417016/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
More information about the textmate
mailing list