[TxMt] Re: textMate 2.0
Jeremy Amos
jeremy at igneramos.com
Fri Dec 4 18:51:56 UTC 2009
On Dec 4, 2009, at 9:41 AM, Dru Kepple <dru at summitprojects.com> wrote:
>
> The reason I went back to a mac yet again was to get textMate. There
> is a version for PC out there if you do a search for PC Version of
> textMate that seems to support all the bundles.
> ---
> ---
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I have heard not-so-nice things about "e" (if that's the "PC Version
> of TextMate" you speak of). I know two people who've tried it, and
> neither found it terribly usable. Bundle support was shaky at best,
> and just in general not the experience they wanted. Both have
> switched to the Mac and are proper TextMate users now.
E-text editor is terribly unstable, and the hoops required to get
bundle support wasn't worth it to me.
Closest I've found to matching the Textmate experience on Windows is
Sublime Text - but I still spend more time in vim in shell sessions on
my windows machine at work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20091204/66d1069e/attachment.html>
More information about the textmate
mailing list