[TxMt] Re: Patch to blogging bundle to enable custom fields

[Michael Tyson]

I'm not entirely sure if it's WP-specific - it's certainly not part of  
the MT spec, from what I understand.

WP provides for multiple values for the one key, which is why the  
numeric ids are there; if no ID is present, WP will create a new  
field, regardless of prior fields with the same key.

I like your idea of using the x- prefix; perhaps a syntax like:

x-«field»-«identifier»: «value»

..Would provide for the numeric ID?  Thoughts?

On 28/11/2008, at 11:03 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:

> On 28 Nov 2008, at 04:33, Michael Tyson wrote:
>
>> [...] format:
>> Custom: field_name (field_id) = field_value
>>
>> Where field_id is an optional numeric value, and retrieved when
>> fetching posts.
>
> Is this specific to WP, i.e. allowing field retrievel via numeric ids?
>
> I think I would prefer a syntax more like:
>
>    x-«field»: «value»
>
> But that does not allow for numeric value, but I am sort of assuming
> all custom fields should just be passed to server as key/value  
> pairs!?!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate

-- 
Michael Tyson | michael.tyson.id.au

m: (+61) 0407 754 124
e: mike at tyson.id.au
aim: mikerusselltyson
twitter: MichaelTyson

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20081129/7b1e78c0/attachment.html>