[TxMt] which version control system to take?

[Christoph Held]

I am very serious about starting using version control for academic writing.
And it is not as if you had nothing to do with it. When doing some reading
along these lines I stumbled about some of your articles in Practex journal.
Although you advocated using Subversion back then, the message for me was to
use any kind of versioning system at all.
The last time doing a manual merge of three documents from different authors
was an absolute nightmare and took a lot of time. Even if I were using
version control for myself only, I'd imagine I could still put it to good
use by feeding it my coauthors works after converting them to plain text
myself. This is actually one of my reasons I am favouring MultiMarkdown over
pure Latex at the moment as it is human readable and easy to convert to
*.rtf or eben *.doc format.

Christoph

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Mark Eli Kalderon <eli at markelikalderon.com>
wrote:

> My two cents:
>
> The most important thing is that you use version control. I have been
> a happy Subversion user for three years now, but eventually found
> myself frustrated with its merging facilities and am now learning Git
> (since it allows you to cherry pick the changes you want to merge).
>
> For your purposes, however, I would not recommend Git (not quite cross
> platform since it lacks a Windows implementation, I think) and its UI
> is not as nice as some alternatives.
>
> I think you might try Mercurial or Bazaar.
>
> There are advantages to using a distributed version control system as
> opposed to a centralized one like Subversion, but really any of
> Subversion, Mercurial, or Bazaar would suit your needs.
>
> They are all easy to install. Since you don't have Leopard yet (which
> has Subversion preinstalled) you can use Martin Ott's OS X binary.[1]
> The first two chapters of the Subversion book (available free online)
> should be enough to get you working with subversion in an afternoon.[2]
>
> There are binaries for OS X and Windows for Mercurial (I think that
> Mercurial also comes with keychain support on OS X).[3] Like
> Subversion, it comes with a nice manual.[4]
>
> Finally, Bazaar also comes with binaries for OS X and Windows.[5] And
> also has extensive documentation.[6]
>
> You might be well served by downloading them all, spend a weekend
> playing with a couple toy repositories and think about how they might
> work best with your envisioned work flow. (Bazaar seems particularly
> flexible in this regard.)
>
> Glad to hear that you are seriously considering version control. Good
> luck.
>
> All the best, Mark
>
> [1] http://homepage.mac.com/martinott/
> [2] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> [3] http://mercurial.berkwood.com/
> [4] http://hgbook.red-bean.com/
> [5] http://bazaar-vcs.org/Download
> [6] http://bazaar-vcs.org/Documentation
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20080301/c3aaa8d9/attachment.html>