[TxMt] which version control system to take?

[Mark Eli Kalderon]

Tim, I am inclined to agree with you about Git. Nonetheless, if  
Christoph is working with colleagues who need to be persuaded to use  
version control at all, Git might not be the best choice. And btw, the  
git-bundle rocks! Nice work. Best, Mark

On Feb 29 2008, at 20:12, Tim Harper wrote:

> I'll chime and say that switching from subversion to git has made me  
> dread working with subversion.
>
> Plus, not to toot my own horn, but I REALLY like working with the  
> git textmate bundle:
> http://gitorious.org/projects/git-tmbundle
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Feb 29, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Mike M wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Christoph Held <prion67 at googlemail.com 
>> > wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> rather than piggybacking on my other thread, I wanted to ask  
>> another question, namely which version control system to take for  
>> collaborative writing projects.
>>
>> Emacs rules! (oh, sorry wrong topic, but expect the same results)
>>
>> I have used subversion for several years, and it works.  However, I  
>> think it can be overkill for smaller projects.  For my personal use  
>> I have been using Bazaar (bzr) for about six months and really like  
>> it.  It is simple to set up, works cross-platform, and is  
>> decentralized (but can be used with a central server).
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________________
>> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
>> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you  
>> don't)
>> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate