[TxMt] Re: SVN?
Constantinos Neophytou ♎
jaguarcy at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 19:14:42 UTC 2007
On Mar 31, 2007, at 12:34 AM, s.ross wrote:
> I was that poster -- or at least one of them -- and I stand by that
> recommendation. Broken builds are simply not acceptable in a team
> environment where everyone needs passing tests to move ahead with
> their work. That's what branch and merge are all about. If you want
> to dork around with the code and check in changes that break the
> build, create a temporary working branch and do all of that there.
>
Well, I agree with everyone on this. Regular check-ins are a must.
And that's exactly the reason why subversion has branches :)
Depending on how you use your branches, you might require people who
have a larger task to work on a separate branch and then merge when
they're done. Personally I have most of the developers working on the
main trunk, and maintain separate 'production' branches, because I
want to monitor everyone's changes easily. And since the code of each
module doesn't interfere with other modules, 'breaking' a revision
won't stop other developers from working on their source.
> My rule of thumb is never make a checkin to trunk that will break a
> build.
>
> Even if you are not running continuous integration or are a single-
> person shop, branching is still a good habit to get into because
> you may need to expand your team size at some point and then
> continuous integration will greatly speed up your development process.
Completely agree, apart from the 'trunk' part... it really depends on
the structure of your repos, it might be the trunk, it might be some
branches.. :) And note i don't necessarily DISagree with the 'trunk'
part, just saying it could be either.
>
> Quoting from the Agile Manifesto[1]
>
> Deliver working software frequently, from a
> couple of weeks to a couple of months, with a
> preference to the shorter timescale.
>
> To deliver working software frequently, you have to keep the
> software working. Right?
>
> [1] http://www.agilemanifesto.org/principles.html
Yes, and whether you keep working branches or a working trunk depends
on how your repository is set up. I prefer to keep working branches,
allows for easy 'version' management and track-back :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1288 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20070331/74bde8aa/attachment.p7s>
More information about the textmate
mailing list