[TxMt] Misguided use of content-type in XHTML/1.1 template

[Scott Hughes]

>
> Sure, XHTML is not useful on the net, etc. -- but what we are  
> discussing here is how a correct XHTML 1.1 template should look,  
> regardless of what the real-life treatment of XHTML for content  
> sent over http is.
>
> If we wanted to cater to the real-life situation, we should really  
> just remove the XHTML support -- but a lot of people do want to use  
> XHTML, and some may actually do it in an environment where it makes  
> sense. For example some produce HTML 4 from their XHTML pages,  
> which has the advantage that they can use the full XML tool suite  
> with their content (when in the states prior to the final  
> publishing step).

If I'm developing content for mobile phones then I do want real  
XHTML, some phones don't like HTML and some phones render differently  
between text/html and XML+XHTML.

Regards

Scott