[TxMt] Why the Ruby syntax needs work

[Thomas Aylott (subtleGradient)]

On Feb 27, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
> Could you btw make a case for the new Ruby syntax? I never figured  
> out what problem it was supposed to solve.

The default Ruby syntax doesn't scope enough stuff.
There are very basic things that are completely missing like
	method calls, operators and lambda variables.

My Ruby Experimental adds these basic things and a few other niceties  
like leading space and core library method names and better  
punctuation support.

The advantage is partly for the ability to better theme Ruby files,  
which many people like myself are looking at all day every day.
Looking at mostly white on black text all day is enough to make you  
go mad.

Another advantage is in using the Select Scope command to better and  
more quickly select the current relevant scope.
When you don't know the language as well as you'd like, having the  
core library methods colored slightly differently can really help you  
to quickly notice any misspellings and such.

So, to sum up:
	finish scoping the basic syntax of the language
		different kinds of operators, methods, lambda variables, basic  
punctuation like the => thing, etc…
	core methods
	Improved text interaction with select scope
	improved readability with leading space scopes
	improved awesomeness with the minimization of unscoped generic text
	
But, that's not really the point.
The point is that a syntax should scope as much as possible, not as  
little as necessary.
Then it's up to each person to choose how you use those scopes.

Just take a bit of a peek for yourselves internet people!
Would you rather spend all day looking at this:
	http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne? 
id=404629435&context=photostream&size=o
or this?
	http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne? 
id=404629540&context=photostream&size=o

(if you hate that theme, just pretend you love it instead)

thomas Aylott — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg — sixteenColors
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20070227/f5de09d2/attachment.html>