[TxMt] Re: bundle organization
Gerd Knops
gerti-textmate at bitart.com
Tue Feb 27 00:36:22 UTC 2007
On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Jacob Rus wrote:
> Gerd Knops wrote:
>> Jacob Rus wrote:
>>> * Change "MIPS" to "Assembler", and then people
>>> can put other assembly language syntaxes in
>>> the same bundle?
>> Actually it probably should be `Assembler/MIPS`, as it is just a
>> question of time before other CPU types might be added, like
>> Assembler/SX
>> Assembler/78Cxx
>> Assembler/68k
>> Assembler/Z80
>
> Yes, exactly. But is there any reason for each to have its own
> bundle?
>
> I think they are better off all in the same bundle. But maybe
> others disagree?
Depends on how much momentum TextMate gains for Assembler use,
especially in the Micro-Controller arena. Typically each Micro-
Controller has a leading development kit. That results in upload and
run commands, templates, custom snippets, probably completion etc. So
yes, for advanced use as a development environment individual bundles
would be beneficial.
Gerd
More information about the textmate
mailing list