[TxMt] Re: Best approach to add new Scoping rules to grammar

[Steve Lianoglou]

Hmm ..

> On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:29 AM, Steve Lianoglou wrote:
>
>> patterns = (
>> {	include = '#constant_placeholder'; },
>> {	include = '#escaped_char'; },
>> );
>> },
>>
>> Do I just fiddle with the first name =  
>> string.quoted.double.block.python to add test.reStructuredText to  
>> it (what's the right way to do that)?
>
> Just add after or before those include lines another include line  
> like:
>
> {  include = 'text.restructuredtext';},

I changed that to look like:
patterns = (
{	include = '#constant_placeholder'; },
{	include = '#escaped_char'; },
{	include = 'text.restructuredtext'; },
);

When I hit the Text button (to activate it), it blows hoses the  
Python source ... it's all colored as if it were one long string.

Lines with text, however, (not just whitespace) now all get an  
addition scope:
meta.paragraph.restructuredtext

which I guess is why its coloring everything like a string, but I  
wonder why it doesn't stop doing that outside of the double quoted  
blocks """ """, where I do the include = 'text.restructuredtext'?

-steve