[TxMt] Re: Python bundle syntax highlighting bug

[Dr. Drang]

I'm voting for option 2. I've never seen a syntax highlighter for a
rich language that works perfectly--except maybe Lisp highlighting in
Emacs--and when the highlighting fails I'd rather it fail to the
plainest highlighting possible.

And adding a no-op "signal" to raw strings that will later be used as
regexes just to turn on some coloring seems very unPythonic in that:

It is ugly.
It is implicit.
It adds complexity.
It detracts from readability.
It is not the obvious way to do it.

> 2. Match raw strings that are arguments to methods from the re
> module.  We will sometimes not match raw strings that are regular
> expressions, but can be pretty well guaranteed to never have a false-
> positive.

-- 
Dr. Drang