[TxMt] Re: Mail language scope

[Jacob Rus]

Allan Odgaard wrote:
> On 26. Oct 2006, at 15:11, James Edward Gray II wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2006, at 1:24 AM, Jacob Rus wrote:
>>> Fred B wrote:
>>>> I think you should fork Markdown and make TextDown.
>>>> And don't tell me you don't have the time.
>>>> Ok, I'm out. :D
>>> This is sort of the plan, but it's on hold for a while.
>> What's the hold up?  Just curious if there is some way we could help...
> 
> It’s just that I try to only focus on TM 2.0 development stuff prior to 
> leaving for NZ, so I can hold a 10 weeks vacation with good conscious :)

JEG2:  I'm going to try to spec a bunch of it out while allan is on 
vacation, so that we can refine/implement it when he gets back.  At that 
point we can ask for some broader feedback.  Though I'm still not clear 
on the best way to do definition lists, footnotes, and tables.  I would 
bring these back up on the Markdown list, but it seems less useful 
recently than it once was, spending all of its time arguing at great 
length about things of (IMO) no import whatsoever, while avoiding major 
issues with hand-wavey explanation.

-Jacob