Re(2): [TxMt] setting more-than-one name to a language pattern

[Michael Sheets]

>> Could it be possible to have new mentions of the same scopeName in  
>> different bundles be additive, instead of the last one winning?
>
> That sounds like an awesome idea!
>
> Or maybe more of an “extends” directive. That would also make it  
> clear which one is the extension (I assume that the extension  
> should have the rules injected first in the existing grammar, so  
> that it can override stuff).

Which also bring to light the feature I've asked for, a flag to make  
a syntax not appear in the popup. Just for cases like this. ;)