[TxMt] How Long Must We Wait for CVS Support?
Jeffrey Robert Spies
jspies at nd.edu
Tue Jun 27 13:41:02 UTC 2006
I'm really quite disappointed in how the list has responded to Court
K.'s feature request. He explained what he was looking for and why
it would be valuable, and even offered a monetary bonus for someone
to work on it (plus assistance with UI design, if I remember
correctly). If you don't want to help out w/ CVS support, why is it
necessary to bash CVS or this guy for doing what everyone else does
when they would like to see a feature added to TextMate? It just
doesn't seem very constructive, but maybe I'm confused as to what
this list is for other than praising Allan and evidently promoting
Subversion.
Jeff.
> On Jun 27, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Court K. wrote:
>
>> You really think I'm going to convince entire fortune 500
>> companies to just switch to subversion? Why not implement cvs? My
>> guess is the reason subversion support sprung up so fast was
>> because it was easier to code. More companies use CVS. Yes,
>> subversion is much nicer, however when dealing with 99% of the
>> companies (if you consult) you will be using a CVS server. Rather
>> than changing every existing company over to subversion, why not
>> support something that is already the standard for version
>> control? That's like saying Mozilla Firefox is superior to
>> Internet Explorer and I should just force every company I consult
>> for, and all their client base to switch to Firefox. It won't work
>> like that. I like subversion too, but in consulting with hundreds
>> of companies I've only found one that actually used subversion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20060627/1c787c36/attachment.html>
More information about the textmate
mailing list