[TxMt] Bug in ruby bundle

[Jeroen van der Ham]

Sune Foldager wrote:
>> So it didn't bother you in the above example where to write the #< 
>> part you had to delete the { as well as the consequent } that sticks 
>> around?
> 
> Again, please compare the few cases where you need # without { to the 
> MANY where you need them together.

I'm no expert on ruby, but perhaps this calls for a macro instead of a 
snippet?
If it is a macro, then the extra } would automatically be deleted.
However, then you would lose the ability to use it on selections..

Jeroen.