[TxMt] BundleForge: time to start?

[thomas Aylott]

On Dec 8, 2006, at 7:32 AM, <domenico.carbotta at fastwebnet.it>  
<domenico.carbotta at fastwebnet.it> wrote:

> three good reasons:
>
> * the GetBundle bundle is a solid foundation;
> * in the community there is no shortage of server-side programming  
> skills
> and, most of all
> * we have ten (10!) weeks without an official release, so that we  
> can tinker
> with BundleForge!
>
> so... why don't we start doing something? :P if there's any amount  
> of python
> code involved, I'm ready to help!

Agreed.
How do you suppose such a thing should work?

I like how the official repo is a single svn server.
But if bundleForge is only a single repo, then everyone has access to  
all of of the bundles.

In case you missed it, I actually already have a quasi-bundleForge now.
It was primarily created for the completion stuff, so that non-core  
committers can still contribute to the BETA releases of the  
codeComplete bundle. With the idea that once it's done it'll go into  
core.


SVN
http://projects.subtlegradient.com/tmcompletion_svn/

RSS SVN LOG
http://trippledoubleyou.subtlegradient.com/textmate/ 
tmcompletion_svnlog.rss

BASECAMP
http://tmcompletion.projectpath.com
login: anonymous
pass: nopass


If you want access to contribute, email me or reply to this message

thomas Aylott — design42 — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20061208/36eb383f/attachment.html>