[TxMt] Better JavaScript functions

Gavin Kistner gavin at refinery.com
Mon Sep 19 12:41:39 UTC 2005


On Sep 19, 2005, at 2:19 AM, Andreas Wahlin wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2005, at 1:23 , Gavin Kistner wrote:
>> FWIW, the second is not valid JS. The first is valid, as is:
>> var functionName = function( ... ){ ... }, but 'var' must not be  
>> followed by a dereferenced object.
>>
>
> Hupps, you're absolutely right, can't believe I wrote that, I blame  
> my not having any private functions in the object I was looking at :)
> It's supposed to be
>
> var functionName = function(arguments) { ... }
> right?

Yup, that would create a local variable pointing to the functionName  
object. (The exact same functionality as using simply: function  
functionName(arguments){ ... }



More information about the textmate mailing list