[TxMt] Better JavaScript functions

[Andreas Wahlin]

On Sep 19, 2005, at 1:23 , Gavin Kistner wrote:

> On Sep 18, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Andreas Wahlin wrote:
>
>> By parens I take it you mean paranthesis? My bad, they aren't  
>> supposed to be there, I used them to emphasise that you can skip  
>> the var part and thus have either
>> this.functionName = function(arguments) { ... }
>> or
>> var this.functionName = function(arguments) { ... }
>>
>
> FWIW, the second is not valid JS. The first is valid, as is:
> var functionName = function( ... ){ ... }, but 'var' must not be  
> followed by a dereferenced object.

Hupps, you're absolutely right, can't believe I wrote that, I blame  
my not having any private functions in the object I was looking at :)
It's supposed to be

var functionName = function(arguments) { ... }
right?

back to the old drawing board
Andreas