[TxMt] Better JavaScript functions
Andreas Wahlin
andreaswahlin at bredband.net
Sun Sep 18 10:01:34 UTC 2005
I added the following to my javascript bundle, over the normal
function detection code (but that wouldn't make any difference, right?)
{ name = "meta.function.js";
match = "^\\s*([a-zA-Z_]\\w*):\\s*(function)\\s*\\(([^)]
*)\\)";
captures =
{ 1 = { name = "entity.name.function.js"; };
2 = { name = "storage.type.function.js"; };
3 = { name = "variable.parameter.function.js"; };
};
},
{ name = "meta.function.js";
match = "^\\s*(var\\b)?\\s*this\\.([a-zA-Z_]\\w*)\\s*=\
\s*(function)\\s*\\(([^)]*)\\)";
captures =
{ 1 = { name = "storage.type.js"; };
2 = { name = "entity.name.function.js"; };
3 = { name = "storage.type.function.js"; };
4 = { name = "variable.parameter.function.js"; };
};
},
the first should match functions like
functionName: function(arguments) { ... }
and the second
(var) this.functionName = function(arguments) { ... }
with the first var being optional.
Is it correct? It seems to work but I don't dare trust my RegExp
skills ;)
Any other comments?
Andreas
More information about the textmate
mailing list