[TxMt] install permissions
Sune Foldager
cryo at cyanite.org
Tue Mar 1 10:56:45 UTC 2005
On 1. mar 2005, at 11:17, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Lang Riley:
>> Is it typical for a TM install to have 'admin' as the group, given a
>> default umask? Just curious.
>
> Look at the parent directory's group ownership. BSD semantics dictates
> that new files inherits the directory's group ownership. Most SYSV
> systems
> (as most Linux install are) emulates this through the use of group
> setuid
> bits (chmod g+s .$dir) on directory.
Apple changed their permissions around several times. I haven't clean
sweeped for some time so I have a lovely mix of staff and admin and
other stuff (group) owning my files here and there. At any rate,
TextMate doesn't install - you copy it yourself, so it has nothing to
do with its own permisions. Also, umask only affects protection bits
and not ownership AFAIK.
--
Sune :: http://cyanite.org/
"And now there is merely silence, silence,
silence, saying all we did not know."
More information about the textmate
mailing list