[TextMate] Ruby syntax coloring glitch

[Jeroen]

Allan Odgaard wrote:
> On 14. Oct 2004, at 13:54, Jeroen wrote:
> 
>> I must say that I'm not really a big fan of the plists file for syntax 
>> highlighting, they don't really work intuitively and the extra \ for 
>> each \ in a regexp really doesn't help either.
> 
> The extra \ can be avoided if you use e.g. Apple's property list editor.

I'll try that.

> As for intuitive, what do you suggest instead?

My grievance is that currently everybody is reinventing the wheel, e.g. 
with the \< and \> around keywords and which things should be in a syntax 
highlight file.
It would be nice if there's a template available which has the most common 
things in a highlight file and with reasonable default values for them.
I'll try to look into that this weekend or something.

Jeroen.