[TextMate] Your syntax definitions?

Sune Foldager cryo at diku.dk
Wed Oct 6 16:02:27 UTC 2004


On 6/10-2004, at 17:59, Brian Lalor wrote:
>
> Pardon me whilst I brainstorm.  What if I could feed TM a grammar 
> (say, in BNF) for a language?  Then TM could figure out syntax 
> highlighting from that based on hints, such as "string literal", 
> "variable", "loop construct", etc?

Something like that _may_ come in a future version. We (Allan and I) 
have discussed something like that, although only very briefly so far. 
I think it is a good idea, but some more thought it needed there of 
course.

-- 
Sune.
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"




More information about the textmate mailing list