[TextMate] Your syntax definitions?
Sune Foldager
cryo at diku.dk
Wed Oct 6 16:02:27 UTC 2004
On 6/10-2004, at 17:59, Brian Lalor wrote:
>
> Pardon me whilst I brainstorm. What if I could feed TM a grammar
> (say, in BNF) for a language? Then TM could figure out syntax
> highlighting from that based on hints, such as "string literal",
> "variable", "loop construct", etc?
Something like that _may_ come in a future version. We (Allan and I)
have discussed something like that, although only very briefly so far.
I think it is a good idea, but some more thought it needed there of
course.
--
Sune.
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"
More information about the textmate
mailing list